Son Of JFK Conspirator Drops Bombshell

Big news that the mainstream news won't touch.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/ma ... irator.htm

 

If you believe the Warren Commission then I have a watch to sell you. If LBJ on video admitted he was the leader in killing of JFK you still would believe the lone gunman theroy.

 

Sorry, I aint buying it. Oliver Stone made a movie about a 'conspiracy'... guy named Clay Shaw was involved. It was a bunch of crap.

And starred -gasp- Kevin Costner!

The longer the 'conspiracy' thing gets bandied about, the more outlandish it gets.

And LBJ was suspected -IF there was a conspiracy- from the very beginning. So that aint exactly earth shattering either, it's like -not rocket science- JFK and LBJ did not like each other... LBJ was only VP so Kennedy could get the southern vote.

Oh.. I have no doubt there WAS a conspiracy... but think it's far more likely Cuban in origin.

 

Well you guys are in the minority with most polls being 80-90% of people not believing the official story.

 

Bruce Willis used to support the neo-con agenda, but it seems he has seen the light.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/ma ... willis.htm

 

Kevin Costner, Bruce Willis, George Clooney, Helen Hunt, Who Cares?...

Since when do actors or celebrities have a credible voice other than what has been scripted for them?

THIS JUST IN: Paris Hilton thinks Wal-Mart is a store that sells walls!

 

I don't need a celebrities to tell me to do or what to think, but some people do. When Rosie O'Donnell came out about 911, Im sure alot of here fans did some research. When people put famous individuals on a high pedestal what they have to say has an impact.

 

whether it's right or completely wrong (which is usually the case), the sheep will follow...

no argument here...

 

Let's reset.... what a conspiracy theory is boils down to 'a complicated alternative to a simple issue'.

The WTC thing is the perfect example. Popular Mechanics did a great job in debunking the planted charges theory, so then the focus shifted to WTC 7 so the effect of the towers' collapse on the steel foundation was examined and shown it would have affected. But non-engineers built some loony popsicle stick type model to show they were right.

And some loonies are now saying it would have been extremely difficult for all 19 {actually there were supposed to be 20} guys to coordinate the hijackings.... and they base this on how difficult it is to pick 4 flights that will all leave on time!

A Utah prof claimed to have de-debunked the rathergate docs, showing they WERE actually real, and showed proof on line. Unfortunately, for him, he didnt use good security on his personal files which showed the extensive pixel mapping he used to come up with the 'proof'

 

I find it funny how all the believers of the governments story only quote Popular Mechanics. Here is a little history on Popular Mechanics, they are owned by Hearst Corporation. William Randolph Hearst wrote the book on cronyism and yellow journalism, also the senior researcher on the 'Debunking 9/11 Lies' piece Benjamin Chertoff is the cousin of Michael Chertoff, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. So Popular Mechanics wouldn't have a reason to whitewash something would they?

 

The conspiracy theory wasn't just brought up in a movie by Oliver Stone. There was an actual trial of Clay Shaw. You know, Jim Garrison was the prosecutor. He even wrote a book about it well before the movie came out. Shaw was acquitted, but that doesn't mean a) there wasn't a conspiracy or b) that Oliver Stone just fabricated the whole thing for a film. It just means that Garrison wasn't able to prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt. Nobody's proved anything beyond a reasonable doubt from the other side either.

And has everyone discussing this actually been to Dealey Plaza in person and surveyed the site of the assassination? If you have, and you can still be so dismissive of alternate theories (other than the lone gunman), I'd be impressed by, if nothing else, your conviction. It would take a lot of it to just put all the holes in the lone guman theory out of mind.

 

Plus Garrison's key witness David Ferrie just happen to commit suicide, which Garrison had most of his case riding on. On the Trail of the Assassins by is a great book, and Jim Garrison was such a brave person taking on the US Government

 

When I saw Jack ruby shoot Oswald, I immediately thought something smelled.

But then the facts came out on who Ruby was, and how he always wanted to be a 'big player' and had failed at about everything. That settled it for me... and I'd never heard of Occam's Hammer.

 

In a AOL poll 80% of 216,771 believed Oswald didn't act alone. I have seen a few polls now, and their always 80% to 90% not believing the offical story.

Link

 

"...and I'd never heard of Occam's Hammer."

Is that something akin to "Thor's Razor?"

 

And that means WHAT?!!!! Here's what it REALLY means... "In a poll of users {who believe that AOL is 'the Internet'}, who cared enough to respond, 80%....."

As opposed to almost EVERYONE who takes a SERIOUS look at it.. meaning they probably ALSO dont get their 'news' from E! and the Comedy Channel.. debunking the freaking conspiracies.

Would you say the guy who wrote 'Helter Skelter' {I mean the BOOK on Tate-LaBianca murders} might be a serious researcher and observer?

Well, here it is, reviewed
in NYT....

Note: I got the tip on this from powerlineblog... and hadnt read the review, yet.. bot here the reviewer makes my point exactly:

In other words, when everyone who is hurt in any way needs to find someone to sue for it, and any sinister event HAS to be the result of some 'secret conspiracy.. the tinfoil hats come out and there are plenty of believers.

What Bugliosi evidently does in this book, in other words, is not only debunk the conspiracy and it's sources, once he gets them down he rips their heads off and shoves them down their necks!

Here's a hint on how to look at this, KW.... my dad is in his dot-age and for some reason he has started to watch the various documentary channels, specifically Discovery and history channels, and his favorite program topic is 'UFO's among us'.
Every 2nd time I visit him, he brings the subject up... and asks me if I think they actually exist. To which I reply ... and this might surprise you..

"Yes I certainly do, and yes, I believe the government has covered them up.... BUT IT DOESNT MATTER!!!!!!!! "

And it doesnt. Likewise, while I think there MIGHT be things yet to be uncovered about the assassination, they are hardly likely to be 'earth-shaking' in the larger view.

No, it wasnt an 'intergalaxy alien ' plot, either.