US to Seek to Host 2018 WC

Discussion in 'Prem talk, Those Other Leagues, and International' started by DCDave, Feb 19, 2007.

  1. DCDave

    DCDave Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    From tomorrow's Washington Post:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 00914.html

    -----------------------

    USSF to Seek to Host 2018 World Cup, but '14 Also a Possibility

    By Steven Goff
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Tuesday, February 20, 2007; Page E03

    The U.S. Soccer Federation is formulating a bid to host the 2018 World Cup, an effort that could bring the quadrennial tournament here for the first time in 24 years as well as position the United States to stage the 2014 event in case a South American country is not ready.

    USSF President Sunil Gulati said yesterday that the federation will form an organizing committee at this weekend's annual meetings in Los Angeles and prepare to formally advise FIFA, the sport's world governing body, of its intentions to compete for the 2018 tournament. England is also planning a bid. The host is likely to be chosen in 2012.

    "We showed in 1994 that the U.S. is capable of hosting a terrific event," Gulati said in a telephone interview. "Now, with the way the soccer landscape in this country has evolved, we would be in position to put on a spectacular event. We are much more a part of the sport than we were in 1994."

    Amid global skepticism about holding the tournament in a nontraditional soccer-playing country, the '94 World Cup set the record for largest average game attendance (68,991) and generated millions of dollars in revenue for the nine U.S. venues, including Washington, and for various national soccer initiatives.

    Last summer's World Cup in Germany, played in stadiums with smaller seating capacities than the U.S. football facilities used in 1994, averaged 52,491, the third-highest figure in tournament history.

    Despite concerns about its preparedness, South Africa is set to host the 2010 tournament. A South American country is scheduled to stage the 2014 event, with Brazil and Colombia having expressed interest, but FIFA President Joseph "Sepp" Blatter has left open the possibility of awarding it elsewhere.

    "We have said that the 2014 World Cup will be staged in South America," he said recently. "But if there is no candidate strong enough, then we would go north instead as the logical thing."

    Mexico -- which hosted in 1970 and '86 -- might also formulate a bid for 2018 and be ready for 2014.

    Gulati said the USSF is focused on 2018, not 2014, but "obviously FIFA knows what we're capable of and, if something else changed, we would be open to any other possibilities."

    FIFA is planning to choose the 2014 site this November, seven years in advance instead of the usual six in case of bidding issues. Most South American countries are supporting Brazil, which has won the World Cup a record five times but has not staged it since 1950. The country will have to rebuild many stadiums and improve its infrastructure. The last South American country to host the World Cup was Argentina in 1978.

    FIFA's decision to award the 1994 tournament to the United States was based largely on big crowds for soccer at the 1984 Olympics in Los Angeles and, Gulati said, faith in the USSF's ability to run a world-class tournament in an emerging soccer nation.

    A bid for 2018, he said, is bolstered by the success of the 1994 event; two successful Women's World Cups; a growing TV audience for international matches; an established pro league in MLS; the emergence of the national team; and the availability of numerous new stadiums, such as those in Seattle, Houston, Tampa and Phoenix, to compete against 1994 host cities.

    "We've got some history and a track record," said Gulati, a Columbia University economics professor who has been involved in U.S. soccer administration for more than 25 years and worked on the 1994 bid committee.

    Gulati, who was elected USSF president last year, said FIFA was "very open" to the idea of a 2018 U.S. bid and that CONCACAF, the governing body for North and Central America and the Caribbean, was "very positive."
     
    #1
  2. BC

    BC New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Location:
    Decatur, IL
    Sounds great to me! I wasn't a soccer fan in 1994 so I missed the World Cup entirely. Next time in it's in the US, I'll take out a friggin' loan to go!

    I'd love to see some games at Lucas Oil field here in Indy. It's so easy to park and get around downtown, it would be a great place to see World Cup soccer.
     
    #2
  3. DCDave

    DCDave Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    There is a lot of discussion on the Washington Post Soccer Insider blog today on this, and my conclusion is that there could be a lot more stadiums that could be used for the World Cup. (The caveats are width--some American football stadiums are not wide enough--and artifical turf--not allowed by FIFA, although several stadiums added temporary grass in 1994.)

    The competition could be very tough. One idea is to have the group games in certain geographic areas to make it easier for player and fan travel, and if you have a chance to choose from a big pool of stadia, I think it makes sense.
     
    #3
  4. BC

    BC New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Location:
    Decatur, IL
    I think the US is a great default choice because we already have the large stadia in place and can prepare for the huge crowds in a timely fashion. The pitch dimensions might be a problem for some places but surely there are enough that fit FIFA regulations (or can be altered to do so).
     
    #4
  5. Spencer

    Spencer New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Location:
    St. Paul, MN
    It could potentially be great if it got some soccer stadiums built in potential MLS markets. Personally I'd like to see Canada included in this. Vancouver and Toronto would both be top notch cites for World Cup games if you could get some quality stadiums built there.

    I must say my general attitude towards it is that its really England’s turn. We've had it recently they haven't. They have the stadiums, infrastructure, and a true football culture. I think they simply deserve it more.
     
    #5
  6. jmh

    jmh New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2006
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    The problem here is that the soccer-specific stadia that are getting built (Crew Stadium: 22,555; Pizza Hut Park: 20,500; Toyota Park: 20,000; Home Depot Center: 27,000; Red Bull Park, 25,000) aren't nearly the size that FIFA will want to see for the World Cup (Berlin: 72,000; Munich: 66,000). The smallest stadium used in 2006 was the 41,000-seater in Nuremberg, still significantly bigger than anything soccer-specific here. I'm not saying this dooms any bid the USSF might make to host, of course (after all, we hosted in 1994 - we've got the BIG stadia like the Rose Bowl and Giants Stadium), but I don't think the new SSSs are going to play into it one way or the other.
     
    #6
Similar Threads: Seek Host
Forum Title Date
Prem talk, Those Other Leagues, and International FIFA Announces Host for 2026 WC Nov 14, 2014
Prem talk, Those Other Leagues, and International Poland/Ukraine to Host Euro 2012 Apr 18, 2007
Prem talk, Those Other Leagues, and International DC United Hosts Chelski Jun 16, 2005
Prem talk, Those Other Leagues, and International USA hosts Colombia in SAN AN-DAMN-TONIO!!!! Jul 31, 2014

Share This Page