Uh oh!

Discussion in 'Miscellaneous' started by HatterDon, Sep 15, 2008.

  1. HatterDon

    HatterDon Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    Location:
    Peoples Republic of South Texas
    The following was attached to a fist-sized bust of William Shakespeare and tossed through my front window. It was printed on rather nice parchment paper.

     
    #1
  2. stlouisbrad

    stlouisbrad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    I'm ok with it, but can we keep baseball. To quote George Bernard Shaw "baseball has the advantage over cricket in that it's over sooner."
     
    #2
  3. WhitesBhoy

    WhitesBhoy Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Location:
    The Beach, For Now
    I'm kind of over baseball for awhile. Maybe we could try cricket for a few seasons and see if its any better...or the season is any shorter.

    162 games, not counting the post-season. Is that really necessary?
     
    #3
  4. IanHux

    IanHux New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Well taking into account the length of cricket games multiplied by the number of them would about equal 162 games of baseball so not much difference there (where I got those facts? In my noggin). Other than the debts and "petrol" prices I'm game. I especially love the one banning pointy football.
     
    #4
  5. SteveM19

    SteveM19 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Location:
    Cleveland OH
    Over the dead body of this linebacker-sized former soldier, sonny.

    However,

    on this one, you may have a point.

    Tee Hee Hee. How quaint. That would have to be a big negative, Neville. Don't make me have to get all redneck on you :wink:
     
    #5

Share This Page