My Matchnight 'Politics and News' Parting Shot

Parting Shot: Marxists' Emperors' Robes continue to unravel

Just to further irritate you lemmings or, as Lenin said, "Useful Idiots", have you checked out Prius Outdoes Hummer in Environmental Damage?

Anyone who bothers to look or even ASK the founders of Greenpeace know the WSW and Commies uber Alles folks have taken over the 'Green' movement long ago. And that's just another chink in the armor that's fallen out, just like REAL data examination of long-term global temp v atmospheric CO2.

The anti-AGW propaganda piece "Swindled" did a fair job of pointing out the holes in Emperor Gores new clothes, and why "ALL" the supposed 'experts' are on the CO2 bandwagon. And just reading the insanities posted by the so-called 'experts' on
realclimate.org really helps, too.

Now, no one is denying the snow-pack and ice sheets are declining... and I'm not necessarily saying driving a Prius isnt a good idea. But I like to think for myself... and while it's fun to point out the 'footprint' thing as ammo against hybrids, I also question how they applied their point-making facts and stats.

i.e.; I dont believe it! Just as I dont believe AlGore on AGW.

What I DO believe is that the Far Left's Plan B will do anything to hobble, then kill, free market capitalism, and the reason for that is being illustrated right now in Venezuela.. just as it was before in Cuba and Zimbabwe.
The REAL goal of Socialism's elite proponents is to keep the world poor. Without the poor, there's no point to Socialism.

Now, I'm just waiting for the commie attack machine to start in on the 'Liberal Thinker's' reassessment of modern nuclear power.
Oh, wait.. here's an example of that, now: Nuclear Power not an option, says Earthlife]

Oh, yes... how are those 'poor darkies' ever going to master such highly technical stuff... and solar panels dont blow up. Also they dont power factories, but that's beside the point. Right! And Ms Kohrs IS a nuclear 'expert', right? Oh.. sorry, maybe not.

Aw crap. I just realized, you guys dont FOLLOW Links... they might expose an 'Inconvenient Truth'. Dont feel bad, the Libs on FUSA wont follow them, either.

In fact, I find that pretty common. All you have to do to realize that is look at posts on the Lefty blogs, v the Righty blogs, and count links and look at sources. Did I say 'sources'? 'We dont need no steenkin' sources.. we know what we know!'

heh...

 

RE: My Matchnight

Please tell me this is NOT your FUSA Political parting shot. Is this your last political post? I may not agree with most things you write, but I enjoy reading them. Please keep the political posts coming.

 

Tom... NO... It's my parting shot on MATCHNIGHT. Since I came over here to educate and entertain you all, I've been accused of slinking off with my tail curled under.

Don.. if you seriously want to debate that, I'd be proud to spar.

 

You'll forgive us if we haven't checked out an editorial in Central Connecticut State University's student newspaper. Maybe you're right and maybe you're not, but is that really the best source you could come up with?

I guess it's OK to use something like that if you're just going to assume we don't follow links, though.

 

You're not a 'lefty' you're a bleedin heart Lib, there's a difference. Unfortunately though, that falls into the 'Useful Idiots' category. Not my term, Lenin's.

What this means is your heart is pure but your brain is in 'Park'

Once the educated and informed intellectuals convince enough of you, there's no turning back because none of us will have any guns.
And, like Russia, there will be enough of a 'dependency' voting bloc supporting them to resist any peaceful change of direction.

And the most direct Link is through the current 'Anti-War' movement, just as back in the sixties.

Look up who's sponsoring the protests, ANSWER.. and then who founded ANSWER.

 

Holy non sequitur, Batman.

 

AGAIN... this is only a transfer of what I posted on Matchnight to rile up some people who must have really missed me.

The MAIN reason I posted it on here, is it's not nice to talk about people behind their backs. Secondarily to rile up some of you, too.

And the link to CCU is to ILLUSTRATE an idiocy, that being 'a Prius really has a bigger carbon footprint than a Hummer'.

 

Congratulations, you're a lib.... with a belief but no debate ammo!
.. ummm.
You forgot the part where, if I'm conservative, I couldnt possibly care about the poor.

Ooops, another non-seq! :banana:

 

Are you being obtuse on purpose or trying to make some point?

There is no absolute 'free-market' economy, of course. But if you want to look at one which stands out against its neighbors and 'what might have been', check out Chile.

 

Well, Don... of COURSE, there's no small group of Leftist conspiracists gather in a small room and plotting out how to take over the world.
This is a case of establishing the seeds of the 'pure religion' and letting nature take its course.

I was waiting for a good example, which you could understand and agree with, of this, and Here it is: WHY PEOPLE THINK CONSERVATIVES ARE IDIOTS!

There's no 'conspiracy of idiots' on the right... and there's no conspiracy of idiots on the left... at least not very effective ones.

But the religion of both alters the way their synapses fire.

 

We rush to its defense.. while recognizing the above... because the ALTERNATIVE is the party of fail and quit.

But 'huge' centralization of government? What way is it been HUGE? Name it.

'profligate' deficit spending? You mean the meds' prescription boondoggle?

Boortz as linked to is against both. But I think he'd call you on the adjectives you use. And I agree with him.

And you are speaking in the round, again. I would so love it, if you'd take one point and the linear debate line.

Those guys on Matchnight couldn't do it, either... which is why I returned to poke 'em with a stick, just one last time.
No idea how they responded as they turned the forums off early.

 

1. Nothing New.

2. Brayed at by many, examples few and easily defended.
- If there was ever a case of 'if you arent doing anything wrong' this is it. Of course we dare not say that.

3. The determination on tribunals follows long held practice. US court trials would set NEW precedent. Not the other way around!

... as for the REST:

"Legislature being USELESS???" You are NOW certainly pulling my leg.

The president cannot allocate money. He has to be given the budget... how finely crafted your post is, to totally avoid the fact that large amounts of that budget deficit was on PORK...the same that Dems have been masters at for years. And Repubs certainly do it too...after all, you can get in real trouble telling your voters that you didnt get them any local money for the good of the country.

And how timely... as the Dems have shut off public disclosures on pork add-ins.

Your LAST part on "If a Dem" is pure talking point, and not even worthy of discussion... but it tells me why we stay away from places like Rwanda and do such weird things where we do go in, like the Balkans. It's to keep you guys at bay.

The Cheney Energy thing.... always a talking point never anything but speculation on what it resulted in. But it's always good to allow it to be put in the fascist box.


Least Qualified Republican.. are we going there again?

What does a Senator do? Dubya was your governor, and you're allowed to say he did a lousy job. But he was a governor.

All Senators do is make pretty speeches appealing to the emotions, he doesnt actually have to DO a damn thing. Which is how Kerry got the nomination, despite being a vapid twit... he talks purty.
And AlGoreacle hasnt done anything lately to make me believe he should have won.
speeches - and articulation, BTW- doesnt get anything done.