Google bans anti-MoveOn ads

Under the premise it infringes 'MoveOn' trademark and copyrights

Yet it allows anti-Blackwater security ads... by name.

Its YouTube division threatened to ban Michelle Malkin videos yet YouTube is full of IslamoFascist vids.

 

Sounds like the private sector is irritating you, Petty. How ironic.

I am sure they will miss you using their search engine. How WILL they recover!!!

 

You didnt address the issue.

Maybe I didnt make it clear.. Oh, wait. Yes I did.

To the left, it's all 'talking points' about 'Religious Influence'. 'HAte Speech' is 'subjective' in meaning.

If you point out the coziness between the left and those who want to destroy us, that's hate speech. Actually giving a forum to those who want to destroy us is... well... okay.

 

Yes, we should go back to stone tablets.

 

I feel your pain on that subject. Everyone on the left can say whatever,whenever, but anyone else is narrow minded. The liberal aint so liberal after all.

 

And dont forget that it took Google over two years before they stopped a search of "failure" from turning up George W. Bush at the top of the list.

Agree Fernando. Liberal people are the least tolerant people that I know, but then again where I live I am surrounded by them.

 

And they are ALL coming to get YOU!

How are things on the funny farm these days?

 

See how intolerant you are being.

 

Intolerant of intolerance, mostly.

 

So... you AGREE on the original point, then!

 

I agree to disagree.

 

On WHAT?!! Google is not a content provider. So you think that it would be okay.. for example.. for ATT as an ISP to route non-specific searches to THEIR content/sites of choice? They are attempting to do that, by the way.

You note my comment is on 'selective' discrimination of what is political or hate speech? Or what amounts to copyright/trademark infringement. In the case of 'Blackwater', I'm pretty sure it qualifies as a trademark.

 

There is what can be deemed "okay", and there is what is "legal". (And never the twain shall meet?)

You should sue the Internet.

 

Nice prevarication, transposing 'Google' to 'the Internet'... I will assume that you think those who selectively apply 'legality' in discrimination of content use or search branching are wrong.

But, no I aint gonna sue. I dont have the money .. someone else who DOES might sue though.

'sides it's more fun seeing what you say to wriggle out when you know I'm right.
:twisted:

 

Never said you (or the others) were wrong, perhaps just misguided and malinformed.

And it's fun to see you and "the followers" struggle with the hypocrisy of the right.

 

Have you read my other recent posts?

BTW... the old projection/diversion saw where one side accuses the other of what they do. Is showing.

 

FFCinPCB, i don't claim to be the most intelligent guy around, especially on the political front, but can you tell me where the hyopcricy is in regards to this issue from the right?

 

FFCinPCB, explain how my comment was intolerant.

 

The right has a tendency, in my view, to put an extreme amount of trust in the private sector to police itself or themselves independently.

Now that google has shown a tendency, apparently according to Fog, to "censor" right wing bomb throwers, Fog and his ilk seem to have their panties in a twist, claiming "it ain't fair!"

May not be fair, but that is private enterprise policing themselves, as they see fit. Live with it.

 

clevelandmo: "Liberal people are the least tolerant people that I know, but then again where I live I am surrounded by them."

You are right, sounds so tolerant you should have beat out Al Gore for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Wonder what other "thems" you are surrounded by?? Eeek!!!