AIG arson

Discussion in 'Miscellaneous' started by pettyfog, Mar 21, 2009.

  1. pettyfog

    pettyfog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    If Wall Street touts and brokers did to AIG what the US Government and media are doing to them, the SEC would have them indicted already.

    You people think you know this 'bonus' issue and are outraged they got bonuses, you dont know shit!
    Fuckwads and so's everyone who voted for these incompetents, crooks and liars.


    Oh... just so's you understand.. I KNOW they brought it on themselves. I am thinking from the point of the initial bailout agreements, so dont get mixed up with the crap they did before the bust... say Sept 2008.
     
    #1
  2. RidgeRider

    RidgeRider Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Fog, I have kept away from the news for the most part but I heard something interesting from one of my 'service club' buddies. He told me that there was language in the original TARP money legeslation that prohibited companies who got TARP loans to use the money for executive bonuses and at at the last minute, that language was removed.

    Is this true?
     
    #2
  3. pettyfog

    pettyfog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Yep.. by the authors
     
    #3
  4. RidgeRider

    RidgeRider Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    So isn't it a bit disingenuous for our politicians to be out there trying to gain political capital by passing 90% tax legislation on 'basically' specific people, when they left the door open for this? No matter how distasteful what AIG did before or after the TARP dollars hit their accounts? AIG will be punished in the markets for their behavior. They are a despised company and people will shy away from doing business with them as it will reflect poorly on their own judgement.
     
    #4
  5. pettyfog

    pettyfog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    In fact, many of those bonuses were contracted in order to hold onto people in order to close out the financial divisions. Otherwise, wouldnt you have split AIG when things started going downhill?
     
    #5
  6. RidgeRider

    RidgeRider Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    No doubt. I wouldn't even want AIG on my resume if I worked there. All I can do is shake my head. Politicians are so sleazy (I know folks not all of them).

    I can't wait to see the lawsuits from those executives affected by this taxation scheme, that you know will end up in the courts, burning US tax dollars, so our government can defend their actions.

    The White House (I realize the previous administration was involved in this) and Congress should just buck up and admit they allowed this to happen for business reasons, and move on. It would be out of the news and folks minds within a month.
     
    #6
  7. EricD

    EricD New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Location:
    Newport Beach, CA
    AIG will have to legal issues itself, and that will be another misuse of bailout money to hire attorneys. Pretty sick.

    It just baffles me how the incompetents continue to rip us off and get away with it. We get to see the double damage living in CA.
     
    #7
  8. Clevelandmo

    Clevelandmo Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Even more sleazy was the way they treated Edward Liddy, AIG CEO, when he testified before Congress. Totally disgusting to treat the man who stepped in to clean up the AIG mess for a salary of one dollar the way that they did. I continue to be dismayed at just about everything Congress does. I'd like to throw them all out. Where's FFC24, I'm starting to sound like an anarchist.
     
    #8
  9. HatterDon

    HatterDon Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    Location:
    Peoples Republic of South Texas
    I'm bemused to see that some posters in this thread who were, earlier, so vehement is attaching blame to people who defaulted on their mortgages and swore that they should receive no pity or concern, are now so solicitous towards the public treatment of the criminals who swindled these mortgage holders and used the money FRAUDULENTLY to make billions while damaging the world's economy in the first place.

    This is the face of what, these days, passes for conservatism.

    Now, I certainly don't want any ex-post facto laws or bills of attainder passed to take away these criminals' bonuses. The first stupid bailout bill -- which some of you same posters insisted was so critical -- allowed these bonus payments. They're legal; that's the way it is. The president and Congress should not be pandering to the public sensibility by proposing or passing legislation so patently unconstitutional in an effort to cover their own complicity and incompetence. After all, we've all suffered through eight years of dispensing with Constitutional guarantees and protections everyy time the president is in a bit of a snit. We don't need that crap any more.

    What we also don't need, if I may be so bold, is sympathy for the devil. And make no mistake, AIG, Wall Street wankers, the bonding services who lied about the viability of these securities, and the mortgage banks who traded in them -- all while at least somewhat aware of their illegality -- are the devil.

    So, can we stop the tears and handwringing about how people have been so rude to these criminal swindlers?
     
    #9
  10. pettyfog

    pettyfog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    And Don CONVENIENTLY forgets the INSTRUMENTS OF THE SWINDLES and who created them.

    Waaaaaaaaaaaaaah! It's ALL BUSH's FAULT!!!

    That aint gonna fly anymore, Don.

    Of course, Don knows all that.

    He knows lots more than he writes... note he puts the finger on the real danger lurking, the retroactive taxing away of wealth of THOSE YOU DONT LIKE.
    The problem is he believes in the perfect society.. and believes in 'sincerity'. I do too. But the fact is you have to make it in peoples' self interests to do the right thing. At this point in time, it's getting harder and harder to do that.
     
    #10
  11. RidgeRider

    RidgeRider Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Honestly he is being intellectually dishonest or agrees and wants blood anyway.

    Don, with all due respect, nobody here is defending AIG at all, perhaps you should start at the top, read slowly, and read every word so you don't misunderstand but.......you can't as a government tell someone you can do something, then because of public outcry "of your mistake" (fueled by the media), retroactively punish those people by taxing them with a special tax, no matter how much you may dislike them, or what you think they represent. In fact, as far as I am concerned the government has no right to weigh in this issue because they opened the doors for it, knowingly. AIG will be punished, as an entity, eventually, have no doubts about that, as has others, as they should.

    Your use of the word 'Devil' is a crafty attempt by you to help make your point, problem is it is emotional and will appeal to some, rather than logical and sensible.

    I won't rehash the origins of our current crisis. It is on another thread but it cannot be blamed where you like it to be, no matter how convenient it would be for your view of the world.
     
    #11
  12. HatterDon

    HatterDon Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    Location:
    Peoples Republic of South Texas
    I'm sorry, but both of you are being -- typically -- disingenuous. Please find where in my post I said

    1. all of this was Bush's fault
    2. where I supported legislation punishing AIG bonus receivers.
    3. that the government should weigh in -- contrary to Constitutional protections.

    You're not going to find that ANYWHERE. What I did say was that SOME PEOPLE who posted here are in a huge hurry to demonize people who have defaulted on their mortgages while leaping to the rescue of those who perpetratred the fraud.

    So, Ridge, "honestly." Read what I wrote -- slowly, and read every word so you don't misunderstand -- especially those lines I wrote in BOLD so that even conservative knee-jerks wouldn't miss them.
     
    #12
  13. RidgeRider

    RidgeRider Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Thank God for this, he seems to get it.

    He says it’s important not to “govern out of anger.” And asked if the measure was constitutional, the former law professor said: “Well, I think that— as a general proposition, you don't want to be passing laws that are just targeting a handful of individuals…And as a general proposition, I think you certainly don't want to use the tax code—is to punish people.”

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/20339.html
     
    #13
  14. SteveM19

    SteveM19 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Location:
    Cleveland OH
    RR your link has died -- can you post it again
     
    #14
  15. pettyfog

    pettyfog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    {fixed the link}

    I'm not sure he does get it. He is governing by sound bite... that's the source of all the hooting about teleprompters.
    You cant say it enough, some politicos seem to think 'talking about something' is the same as doing something about it.
    The mess in the background.. what started this thread.. is the result of trying to be SAYING what the speaker THINKS the public wants to hear.
    - - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - - -
    Pardon me.. since it was in this thread, I assumed the reference was to Bush pushing through more low ball mortgage stuff. Instead it was about stuff having nothing to do with the thread and which you JUST KNOW but cant prove.

    name names... I dont see that on here. And can we talk about how they were signed up for those mortgages in the first place?*
    Again... let's name names... be sure to include all those who made it possible.*

    * Let me amend that to say:IN ANOTHER THREAD PLEASE. There's already a thread on it from last year.
    THIS is about the numbskull handling of the current crisis, this place and time.
     
    #15
  16. Clevelandmo

    Clevelandmo Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
  17. SteveM19

    SteveM19 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Location:
    Cleveland OH
    In my last banking job, one of my favorite customers was an AIG sales rep. He had nothing to do with their mess -- he was a retired teacher and took an agent position after he retired. Once he commented to me that he wished his retirement job wasn't such a rat race. I left only 3-4 months before everything went pear shaped in the subprime markets and for AIG. Wonder how his position fared
     
    #17
  18. pettyfog

    pettyfog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Dear Mr Liddy, I quit!

    That was sent yesterday. Anyone who paid attention knew or surmised what was happening within AIG, after the agreement.

    Why? Becasue it made sense. Now not only do those who have stock in AIG lose money because of this ridiculous grandstanding to appeal to the brain dessicated mob who actually believe ACORN is something other than a subversive organization, the taxpayer loses, too because Congress made us a stakeholder in that house then invited vandals in to destroy it.

    Why did these politicos do this? Well, FIRST because they think we're all stupid and only react to emotional stimuli.
    Well, we're not all stupid. I didnt vote for Obama, I know who Pelosi and Reid are .. and I know what Maxine Waters IS!
     
    #18
  19. pettyfog

    pettyfog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    You know... that's as good an explanation as any I've seen. Of course, they dont bother with explaining how that is possible in the first place... that wouldnt be politically correct.
     
    #19
  20. HatterDon

    HatterDon Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    Location:
    Peoples Republic of South Texas
    Once again, an expletive-filled tear-stained defense of rich white people who helped trash our economy while stuffing their pockets, with an added dash of a slam at an at organization developed to help poor people [largely black] who didn't trash the economy at all.

    Well done, 'fog. Well done.
     
    #20

Share This Page