That might explain Brian Ching's massive dumbass attack. :roll: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/s ... =si_soccer $500? If he was in the Prem he would have been suspended, if not drawn and quartered. Twitter is the spawn of Satan. :3d crying:
I'll be the first to admit I dont understand twitter or know how "official" or "public" it is, but why should he be fined at all? It wasnt on the pitch, it wasnt in an interview. Isnt that kind of invading his personal privacy? Shouldnt he be able to say whatever he wants on his own time? I can see him losing sponsorships or fans for something done on his own time, but a fine by the league?
Mo, I think you'll find that anyone in any sport anywhere in the world who publicly accuses a match official of being "a cheat" is going to be fined. Posting it on Twitter is the same as saying it in a post-match interview. Twitter is public communication. It's called "bringing the game into disrepute." I call it "a massive dumbass attack."
whateva . . . . still seems stupid to me. Why should they care what he says on twitter. And not to pick a fight or anything, but young Bradley's comments to a particular ref didnt garner these sort of "dum bass" remarks from you. And those consequences could've been serious.
