Russia Sends a Message

Discussion in 'Miscellaneous' started by pettyfog, Aug 12, 2008.

  1. pettyfog

    pettyfog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Charges and countercharges are flying on which country actually pushed the boundaries to the point of war. And we probably wont know for a while.

    We DO know that the US has been pushing the former Eastern Bloc countries for inclusion in NATO, that Russia also isnt happy about anti-missile defense systems being proposed in some of those countries.

    But it's one place where I agree with Paleo-cons, on the 'foreign entanglements' aspect. The US should have assumed a back seat in NATO.. or pulled out of it altogether.. in favor of letting the Europeans handle it, end result being what it may.
    Instead of NATO, the US and Atlantic bordering countries might have entered into a 'situational pact'.
    Here's a good post on what is probably behind the current events:
    War in Georgia: What is to be done?
     
    #1
  2. HatterDon

    HatterDon Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    Location:
    Peoples Republic of South Texas
    I agree with you 'fog. With the fall of the USSR, NATO should have been constricting, rather than growing. It should have become Europe's mutual defense shelter, and we should be restricted to sending them postcards now and again. It is insanity to expand NATO to include former Soviet republics all the while innocently claiming that we have no aggressive designs on Russia. Russia is the MOST paranoid of nations, which is why they hijacked all the bordering republics in the first place. Only an idiot would believe that adding a former Soviet republic to NATO wouldn't freak out the Russkies.

    And, finally, will someone [President McCain?] please note that Reagan is dead and pull the life-support plug on "the missile shield?" It has morphed from an outer-space Maginot line born in the somewhat addled brain of #40, into a huge corporate welfare boondoggle in which industry can create whatever they want and we'll buy whatever they produce. This administration determined that all that testing and "fly-before-buy" was just too much bureaucracy and, instead, decided that it would be "more efficient" just to take contractors at their word that whatever crap they built worked. Yet another fine example of governance-in-action. Then, they decided that SDI could be used as a way to persuade emergent nations in Eastern Europe to pretend to be "part of the coalition." They send a few troops here and there and we let them milk the cash cow.

    I guess when our president "looked into Putin's eyes and saw his soul" he must have missed that big sign that said turning our resentful neighbors into your new best friends, and promising them a chance to base missiles might make him a little nervous. We here in the USA are safe, of course, because -- like everybody in the world who doesn't vote Republican -- the Russians know that SDI will never do what it was intended to do and won't ever be a real threat to anybody, other than the US's budget balance. SDI only continues to exist as an expensive pipedream because the "faithful" believe that everything Reagan touched is now a holy icon to be venerated and preserved like holy writ.

    There are times that our government -- regardless of which party is dominant -- reminds me of a Gilbert and Sullivan production. Sheesh.
     
    #2
  3. nevzter

    nevzter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Location:
    A City by a Bay
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/1661245.stm

    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.h ... A962958260

    On the flip side of the above comments on NATO contraction, I was curious if Russia had ever been formally offered membership in NATO? In my brief search I came across the two articles above, which didn't provide me with a concrete answer (apparently it was discussed in the mid 1990s), however they do show how U.S./western relations with Russia have slowly eroded over the past couple of years.
     
    #3
  4. Martin-in-Nashville

    Martin-in-Nashville New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2005
    Location:
    Smyrna TN
    Well we have nothing to worry about now Fog and HD have actually agreed on somthing?
     
    #4
  5. pettyfog

    pettyfog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Here's the best {actually just about the only} analysis I've seen about why Ossetia was so important to both nations.

    And, BTW, Martin. Don's dead WRONG about the missile defense. {It must bug the hell outa him that it actually works.}

    The likelihood Russia's going to launch on us or Europe is minuscule. Rogue nations like Iran and N Korea, OTOH.....
     
    #5
  6. HatterDon

    HatterDon Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    Location:
    Peoples Republic of South Texas
    Good link, 'fog. This is a solid tactical assessment of the region and the situation.

    I heard yesterday South Ossetia compared to Ohio, at least in the context of occupying a huge chunk of the upper midwest of the US. The map shows what the guy was on about.

    Interesting piece of terror statesmanship on the Russian side. They awarded Russian citizenship to anyone in South O who wanted it, then they asserted their rights to "protect our citizens from oppression." Sounds like something right out of Hitler's playbook in the 1930s: see the Sudentenland, Austria, Czechoslovakia, etc. etc.

    I'm not sure we have a horse there, but if there really is a UN or a NATO, something should be done. It was ludicrous to have Russian "peace keepers" stationed there in the first place. It'd be a joke if folks weren't getting killed.
     
    #6
  7. RidgeRider

    RidgeRider Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Good discussion and very good and understandable article. Not sure where the real 'Russian truth' is in all this but if you play out what is possible, it is a real possibility for creation of instability and re-assertion of their will in all the countries surrounding them. They are moving backwards from Gorbachev and given their history of oligarchy and the Russian citizens seeming comfort with it, it is troubling. My Polish friend sums it up to the Russian mentality -- ''command and control'. It is what they know and what they are comfortable with. Love to hear someone who actually has experience with their culture in relation to foreign policy.
     
    #7
  8. pettyfog

    pettyfog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Another message they didnt intend though...

    Georgia downed at least 4 Russian planes using soviet SAM's.

     
    #8
  9. WonsanUnited

    WonsanUnited New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2006
    The media has been completely biased. Sakashvilli is a phony. The man was beating up protesters and taking opposition media off the air only a few months ago.

    And pettyfog, Iran won't develop a missile that will hit Europe for quite somtime, and getting a nuclear warhead into a missile will take them longer. The US is just trying to expand their influence into the former Soviet Republics.

    NATO is an outdated alliance that should just be terminated. The USSR is dead!
     
    #9
  10. pettyfog

    pettyfog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Well, WU... that's why I couched it as I did. Most stuff I read promotes 'a pox on both their houses' meme.

    But if you read ALL the news accounts, Russia's doing their damndest to reconstitute USSR. While 'vili may indeed done all that, the Russians have certainly done the same in this go 'round.
    Like you say, though, NATO is outdated... they been on the teat too long. And btw that probably explains some of 'vili's methods. They were modus operandi for so long, when Georgia was a key USSR state, he didnt think twice.

    You're dead wrong about Iran and missiles though. Never mind their latest ballistic missile test was a flop, they have access to everything they need to get a medium range nuke missile within two years.
    And they have no intention on using the first good ones against Europe... WTH gave you that idea?
     
    #10
  11. pettyfog

    pettyfog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    One of the ways you deal with being invaded is to keep your sense of humor.

    And use it to tweak the noses of the intruder.

    Great Stunt! But why isnt it on Network News? And how is it that world class military powers are subject to such laughter?
     
    #11
  12. WonsanUnited

    WonsanUnited New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2006
    Again, it takes years to develop a nuclear warhead. It's also going to take a few years for them to develop a nuclear bomb. But judging for the IAEA reports and the NIE, I think they've scrapped that idea.

    I read something funny yesterday that this Ukrainian guy wrote. The US at least talks about democracy and human rights when they invade countries, Russia doesn't.

    Imperialism sucks.
     
    #12
  13. HatterDon

    HatterDon Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    Location:
    Peoples Republic of South Texas
    RE: Obama sends a message (litterally)

    Here's my question: Where's Wonsan United? I miss his unique input on all things soccer and non-soccer.

    Come back!! Timmy!! Lassie!! All is forgiven!
     
    #13
Similar Threads: Russia Sends
Forum Title Date
Miscellaneous Pole Pres Dies in Russia Apr 10, 2010
Miscellaneous Obama on Russia - Georgia Aug 12, 2008
Miscellaneous USA 3-2 Russia Feb 15, 2014

Share This Page