Ok...this needs to stop. Period. Complete BS. Watch the entire thing.
http://www.wthr.com/video?autoStart=tru ... 6vBDzkdCQE.
And no I am not anti-immigrant, I am anti-fraud.
DCHeather wrote:Ok...this needs to stop. Period. Complete BS. Watch the entire thing.
http://www.wthr.com/video?autoStart=tru ... 6vBDzkdCQE.
And no I am not anti-immigrant, I am anti-fraud.
and she replied with this comment:
DCHeather wrote:It may be a small amount of the fraud, but it seems so obvious to someone that looks at the return that it's far from accurate. Really...20 nieces and nephews live at the residence? Seriously, they need an act of congress to use common sense? I can't remember how we claim our little one as a dependent on our tax form, but I believe we need to put his DOB and SS# on there. My husband insists on his family's accountant to file our tax returns. But I'm inclined to believe it's not as easy for someone who just listing a child's name and relationship on their return to claim the credit.
I think that's what bugs me the most about the story. The IRS knows it's happening, it's obvious and blatant...yet send out refund checks sometimes in excess of $25,000? FFS.

Romney: Well because, if you take a trillion dollars for instance, out of the first year of the federal budget, that would shrink GDP over 5%. That is by definition throwing us into recession or depression. So I’m not going to do that, of course.
Chait notes, bemusedly, that this deviation from orthodoxy has provoked no outrage on the right, which to him is further proof of just how cynical the Republican anti-Keynesian stance really is:

Users browsing this forum: sacffc and 1 guest